🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's lawmakers have decided to pull out from an global treaty created to safeguard women from abuse, covering domestic abuse, following prolonged and heated debates in the parliament.

Thousands of demonstrators assembled in Riga this past week to oppose the decision. The ultimate decision now rests with Head of State the nation's president, who must determine whether to approve or veto the legislation.

Known as the European treaty, the international accord only took effect in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, mandating authorities to establish legal frameworks and support services to eliminate all forms of abuse.

The Baltic nation has become the first EU country to initiate the procedure of exiting from the treaty. The transcontinental nation withdrew in two years ago, a decision that rights groups described as a major regression for women's rights.

Ideological Debate and Opposition

The treaty was ratified by the EU in last year, yet conservative factions have argued that its emphasis on gender equality weakens family values and promotes what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a lengthy debate in the Saeima, MPs voted 56 to 32 to exit from the treaty, a action proposed by political opponents but backed by politicians from one of the three governing partners.

The outcome represents a setback for centre-right Prime Minister the nation's PM, who joined demonstrators outside parliament earlier this seven-day period. "We will not surrender, we will continue fighting so that violence does not triumph," she stated to the crowd.

Ideological Divisions and Reactions

One of the primary political groups advocating for the withdrawal is Latvia First, whose head has urged the public to choose between what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "gender ideology with multiple sexes".

The nation's ombudswoman the rights official appealed for the treaty not to be made political, while the group the rights organization stated it was "not a danger to Latvian values, it served as a tool to achieve them".

The recent vote has sparked broad outcry both inside Latvia and internationally.

22,000 individuals have signed a national appeal calling for the convention to be preserved. The gender equality group Centrs Marta has announced a demonstration for the coming week, accusing lawmakers of disregarding the will of the nation's citizens.

International Worries and Potential Future Actions

The head of the European organization's legislative body commented that the Baltic state had made a hasty decision fueled by misinformation. He described it as an "never-before-seen and deeply concerning regression for female equality and fundamental freedoms in Europe".

He added that since the transcontinental nation left the treaty in 2021, instances of gender-based killings and abuse targeting females had increased significantly.

Because the decision did not secure a supermajority majority, the head of state could potentially return the bill for further consideration if he has concerns.

President the national leader announced on digital platforms that he would assess the vote according to constitutional requirements, "considering state and legal considerations, rather than ideological or political viewpoints".

Recently, another member of the ruling coalition, the Progressives, suggested it would not exclude petitioning to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a worrisome situation for gender equality not only in Latvia but across Europe," commented a rights advocate.

• Family violence statistics have been rising in several European countries
• The European treaty mandates particular legal protections for survivors of gender-based violence
• The nation's vote could affect comparable discussions in other EU countries